| 
              
               
                |  |   
                | 
 Relevant 
                    articles from Legal 
                    Updates blog  
                    Financial support for abandoned woman and family Rights 
                    and obligations of husbands and wives 
 Adultery, 
                    concubinage and psychological violence
 
 Divorce 
                    obtained abroad by a Filipino citizen against alien spouse 
                    recognized in the Philippines
 
 Divorce 
                    and remarriage
 
 The 
                    Amy Perez case: Psychological incapacity in annulment of marriages
 Mediation 
                    not applicable to domestic violence cases  
                    Custody 
                    battles over children: what determines fitness of a parent 
                    over another?
 Can 
                    a mother be deprived of custody of her child?
 Can 
                    you legally force your spouse to live with and to love you? When 
                    a man is married to or living in with several women successively 
                    or simultaneously, who has the right to inherit from him? Free 
                    PDF newsletters on legal issues available for download Relevant 
                    articles from Salt 
                    and Light blog (on 
                    relationships, marriage and family) Lessons 
                    in life and love from Miriam Quiambao Relationship 
                    tips for Shalani (and other single men and women) Getting 
                    married? Take a look at what "covenant marriage" 
                    is How 
                    to save your marriage alone Boundaries 
                    in Marriage Oldies 
                    but Goodies: Ten Commandments for Wives and Husbands Why 
                    Marriages Fail: He said, She said ...  Communication: 
                    Key to your Marriage  "Sad 
                    Movies Always Make Me Cry"  Surviving 
                    Marital Infidelity Marital 
                    infidelity: causes, consequences and conclusions  Hope 
                    and help for the battered woman (4): Emotional abuse / psychological 
                    violence
 Hope 
                    and help for the battered woman (5): Biblical response to 
                    abuse; evangelical Christians are best husbands – University 
                    of Virginia study
 “Are 
                    you ready? Let’s get it on!” Marriage: The Ultimate 
                    Fighting Championship  All 
                    about women: Move over, Jang Geum! Do 
                    wives really want husbands to share their feelings and thoughts 
                    with them?  Emotional 
                    word pictures as a communication tool for increasing intimacy 
                    between husbands and wives  Hate 
                    Eight? Eight kinds of husbands and wives  Love 
                    Potion No. 9  Men 
                    are terrible mind readers ... Rights 
                    and obligations between husband and wife from the Biblical 
                    standpoint and that of the Family Code  Ruffa, 
                    Ylmaz, TV Patrol, divorce and remarriage by Filipinos  The 
                    only exercise some people do is jumping to conclusions: Mind 
                    reading and negative interpretations  Transformers: 
                    Why do persistent suitors become passive husbands?  Update 
                    on the Mary Winkler case: A word of hope and encouragement 
                    for pastors' wives and female church workers  Why 
                    do men think the things they think, say the things they say, 
                    and do the things they do?  Malcampo-Sin vs. SinG.R. 
                    No. 137590.
 March 26, 2001
 The Family Code emphasizes the 
                    permanent nature of marriage, hailing it as the foundation 
                    of the family. It is this inviolability which is central to 
                    our traditional and religious concepts of morality and provides 
                    the very bedrock on which our society finds stability. Marriage 
                    is immutable and when both spouses give their consent to enter 
                    it, their consent becomes irrevocable, unchanged even by their 
                    independent wills. However, this inviolability 
                    depends on whether the marriage exists and is valid.  If it 
                    is void ab initio, 
                    the “permanence” of the union becomes irrelevant, and the 
                    Court can step in to declare it so.  Article 36 of the Family 
                    Code is the justification. Where it applies and is duly proven, 
                    a judicial declaration can free the parties from the rights, 
                    obligations, burdens and consequences stemming from their 
                    marriage. A declaration of nullity of 
                    marriage under Article 36 of the Family Code requires the 
                    application of procedural and substantive guidelines.  While 
                    compliance with these requirements mostly devolves upon petitioner, 
                    the State is likewise mandated to actively intervene in the 
                    procedure. Should there be non-compliance by the State with 
                    its statutory duty, there is a need to remand the case to 
                    the lower court for proper trial. Tenebro vs. CAG.R. No. 150758.
 February 18, 2004
 We are called on to 
                    decide the novel issue concerning the effect of the judicial 
                    declaration of the nullity of a second or subsequent marriage, 
                    on the ground of psychological incapacity, on an individual’s 
                    criminal liability for bigamy. We hold that the subsequent 
                    judicial declaration of nullity of marriage on the ground 
                    of psychological incapacity does not retroact to the date 
                    of the celebration of the marriage insofar as the Philippines’ penal laws are concerned. As such, an individual who 
                    contracts a second or subsequent marriage during the subsistence 
                    of a valid marriage is criminally liable for bigamy, notwithstanding 
                    the subsequent declaration that the second marriage is void 
                    ab initio on the ground of psychological incapacity. Petitioner in this 
                    case, Veronico Tenebro, contracted marriage with private complainant 
                    Leticia Ancajas on April 10, 1990. The two were wed by Judge 
                    Alfredo B. Perez, Jr. of the City Trial Court of Lapu-lapu City. Tenebro and Ancajas 
                    lived together continuously and without interruption until 
                    the latter part of 1991, when Tenebro informed Ancajas that 
                    he had been previously married to a certain Hilda Villareyes 
                    on November 10, 1986. Tenebro showed Ancajas a photocopy of 
                    a marriage contract between him and Villareyes. Invoking this 
                    previous marriage, petitioner thereafter left the conjugal 
                    dwelling which he shared with Ancajas, stating that he was 
                    going to cohabit with Villareyes. On January 25, 1993, 
                    petitioner contracted yet another marriage, this one with 
                    a certain Nilda Villegas, before Judge German Lee, Jr. of 
                    the Regional Trial Court of Cebu City, Branch 15. When Ancajas 
                    learned of this third marriage, she verified from Villareyes 
                    whether the latter was indeed married to petitioner. In a 
                    handwritten letter, Villareyes confirmed that petitioner, 
                    Veronico Tenebro, was indeed her husband. The second tier of 
                    petitioner’s defense hinges on the effects of the subsequent 
                    judicial declaration of the nullity of the second marriage 
                    on the ground of psychological incapacity. Petitioner argues 
                    that this subsequent judicial declaration retroacts to the 
                    date of the celebration of the marriage to Ancajas. As such, 
                    he argues that, since his marriage to Ancajas was subsequently 
                    declared void ab initio, the crime of bigamy was not 
                    committed.  This argument is not 
                    impressed with merit. Petitioner makes much of the judicial 
                    declaration of the nullity of the second marriage on the ground 
                    of psychological incapacity, invoking Article 36 of the Family 
                    Code. What petitioner fails to realize is that a declaration 
                    of the nullity of the second marriage on the ground of psychological 
                    incapacity is of absolutely no moment insofar as the State’s 
                    penal laws are concerned. As a second or subsequent 
                    marriage contracted during the subsistence of petitioner’s 
                    valid marriage to Villareyes, petitioner’s marriage to Ancajas 
                    would be null and void ab initio completely regardless 
                    of petitioner’s psychological capacity or incapacity. Since 
                    a marriage contracted during the subsistence of a valid marriage 
                    is automatically void, the nullity of this second marriage 
                    is not per se an argument for the avoidance of criminal 
                    liability for bigamy. Pertinently, Article 349 of the Revised 
                    Penal Code criminalizes “any person who shall contract a second 
                    or subsequent marriage before the former marriage has been 
                    legally dissolved, or before the absent spouse has been declared 
                    presumptively dead by means of a judgment rendered in the 
                    proper proceedings”. A plain reading of the law, therefore, 
                    would indicate that the provision penalizes the mere act 
                    of contracting a second or a subsequent marriage during the 
                    subsistence of a valid marriage. Thus, as soon as the 
                    second marriage to Ancajas was celebrated on April 10, 1990, 
                    during the subsistence of the valid first marriage, the crime 
                    of bigamy had already been consummated. To our mind, 
                    there is no cogent reason for distinguishing between a subsequent 
                    marriage that is null and void purely because it is 
                    a second or subsequent marriage, and a subsequent marriage 
                    that is null and void on the ground of psychological incapacity, 
                    at least insofar as criminal liability for bigamy is concerned. 
                    The State’s penal laws protecting the institution of marriage 
                    are in recognition of the sacrosanct character of this special 
                    contract between spouses, and punish an individual’s deliberate 
                    disregard of the permanent character of the special bond between 
                    spouses, which petitioner has undoubtedly done.  Moreover, the declaration 
                    of the nullity of the second marriage on the ground of psychological 
                    incapacity is not an indicator that petitioner’s marriage 
                    to Ancajas lacks the essential requisites for validity. The 
                    requisites for the validity of a marriage are classified by 
                    the Family Code into essential (legal capacity of the contracting 
                    parties and their consent freely given in the presence of 
                    the solemnizing officer) and formal (authority of the solemnizing 
                    officer, marriage license, and marriage ceremony wherein the 
                    parties personally declare their agreement to marry before 
                    the solemnizing officer in the presence of at least two witnesses). 
                    Under Article 5 of the Family Code, any male or female of 
                    the age of eighteen years or upwards not under any of the 
                    impediments mentioned in Articles 37 and 38 may contract marriage. In this case, all 
                    the essential and formal requisites for the validity of marriage 
                    were satisfied by petitioner and Ancajas. Both were over eighteen 
                    years of age, and they voluntarily contracted the second marriage 
                    with the required license before Judge Alfredo B. Perez, Jr. 
                    of the City Trial Court of Lapu-lapu City, in the presence 
                    of at least two witnesses. Although the judicial 
                    declaration of the nullity of a marriage on the ground of 
                    psychological incapacity retroacts to the date of the celebration 
                    of the marriage insofar as the vinculum between the 
                    spouses is concerned, it is significant to note that said 
                    marriage is not without legal effects. Among these effects 
                    is that children conceived or born before the judgment of 
                    absolute nullity of the marriage shall be considered legitimate. 
                    There is therefore a recognition written into the law itself 
                    that such a marriage, although void ab initio, may 
                    still produce legal consequences. Among these legal consequences 
                    is incurring criminal liability for bigamy. To hold otherwise 
                    would render the State’s penal laws on bigamy completely nugatory, 
                    and allow individuals to deliberately ensure that each marital 
                    contract be flawed in some manner, and to thus escape the 
                    consequences of contracting multiple marriages, while beguiling 
                    throngs of hapless women with the promise of futurity and 
                    commitment.  As a final point, we note that based on 
                    the evidence on record, petitioner contracted marriage a third 
                    time, while his marriages to Villareyes and Ancajas were both 
                    still subsisting. Although this is irrelevant in the determination 
                    of the accused’s guilt for purposes of this particular case, 
                    the act of the accused displays a deliberate disregard for 
                    the sanctity of marriage, and the State does not look kindly 
                    on such activities.Marriage is a special 
                    contract, the key characteristic of which is its permanence. 
                    When an individual manifests a deliberate pattern of flouting 
                    the foundation of the State’s basic social institution, the 
                    State’s criminal laws on bigamy step in. Abunado vs. PeopleG.R. No. 159218.
 March 30, 2004
 The subsequent judicial 
                    declaration of the nullity of the first marriage was immaterial 
                    because prior to the declaration of nullity, the crime had 
                    already been consummated. Moreover, petitioner’s assertion 
                    would only delay the prosecution of bigamy cases considering 
                    that an accused could simply file a petition to declare his 
                    previous marriage void and invoke the pendency of that action 
                    as a prejudicial question in the criminal case. We cannot 
                    allow that. Ancheta vs. AnchetaG.R. No. 145370.
 March 4, 2004
 The action in Rule 
                    47 of the Rules of Court does not involve the merits of the 
                    final order of the trial court. However, we cannot but express 
                    alarm at what transpired in the court a quo as shown 
                    by the records. The records show that for the petitioner’s 
                    failure to file an answer to the complaint, the trial court 
                    granted the motion of the respondent herein to declare her 
                    in default.  The public prosecutor condoned the acts of the 
                    trial court when he interposed no objection to the motion 
                    of the respondent.  The trial court forthwith received the 
                    evidence of the respondent ex-parte and rendered 
                    judgment against the petitioner without a whimper of protest 
                    from the public prosecutor. The actuations of the trial court 
                    and the public prosecutor are in defiance of Article 48 of 
                    the Family Code, which reads: Article 
                    48. In all cases of annulment or declaration of absolute 
                    nullity of marriage, the Court shall order the prosecuting 
                    attorney or fiscal assigned to it to appear on behalf of the 
                    State to take steps to prevent collusion between the parties 
                    and to take care that evidence is not fabricated or suppressed. The task of protecting 
                    marriage as an inviolable social institution requires vigilant 
                    and zealous participation and not mere pro-forma compliance. 
                    The protection of marriage as a sacred institution requires 
                    not just the defense of a true and genuine union but the exposure 
                    of an invalid one as well. A grant of annulment 
                    of marriage or legal separation by default is fraught with 
                    the danger of collusion. Hence, in all cases for annulment, 
                    declaration of nullity of marriage and legal separation, the 
                    prosecuting attorney or fiscal is ordered to appear on behalf 
                    of the State for the purpose of preventing any collusion between 
                    the parties and to take care that their evidence is not fabricated 
                    or suppressed.  If the defendant-spouse fails to answer the 
                    complaint, the court cannot declare him or her in default 
                    but instead, should order the prosecuting attorney to determine 
                    if collusion exists between the parties.  The prosecuting 
                    attorney or fiscal may oppose the application for legal separation 
                    or annulment through the presentation of his own evidence, 
                    if in his opinion, the proof adduced is dubious and fabricated.  
                     Our Constitution is 
                    committed to the policy of strengthening the family as a basic 
                    social institution.  Our family law is based on the policy 
                    that marriage is not a mere contract, but a social institution 
                    in which the State is vitally interested. The State can find 
                    no stronger anchor than on good, solid and happy families. 
                    The break-up of families weakens our social and moral fabric; 
                    hence, their preservation is not the concern of the family 
                    members alone. Free 
                    PDF newsletters on legal issues available for download How 
                    to become a Christian  
                    Who 
                    is God? What is man? Who is Christ? Repent and believe 
 |  | | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 
 | Executive 
              Order No. 209                 
              The Family Code of the Philippines
 (For 
              a discussion of relevant issues, please surf to the blogs Legal 
              Updates 
              and Salt 
              and Light. 
              You can also download 
              free PDF newsletters on various legal issues.)
 Chapter 1. 
              Requisites of Marriage Article 1. Marriage is a special contract of permanent union between a man and a 
              woman entered into in accordance with law for the establishment 
              of conjugal and family life. It is the foundation of the family 
              and an inviolable social institution whose nature, consequences, 
              and incidents are governed by law and not subject to stipulation, 
              except that marriage settlements may fix the property relations 
              during the marriage within the limits provided by this Code. (52a) 
               Art. 2. 
              No marriage shall be valid, unless these essential requisites are 
              present:   
              (1) Legal capacity of the contracting 
                parties who must be a male and a female; and  (2) Consent freely given in the 
                presence of the solemnizing officer. (53a) Art. 3. The 
              formal requisites of marriage are:   
              (1) Authority of the solemnizing 
                officer;
 (2) A valid marriage license 
                except in the cases provided for in Chapter 
                2 of this Title; and
 
 (3) A marriage ceremony 
                which takes place with the appearance of the contracting parties 
                before the solemnizing officer and their personal declaration 
                that they take each other as husband and wife in the presence 
                of not less than two witnesses of legal age. (53a, 55a)
 Art. 4. The 
              absence of any of the essential or formal requisites shall render 
              the marriage void ab initio, 
              except as stated in Article 35 (2).  A defect in any of the essential 
              requisites shall not affect the validity of the marriage but the 
              party or parties responsible for the irregularity shall be civilly, 
              criminally and administratively liable. (n)  Art. 5. Any 
              male or female of the age of eighteen years or upwards not under 
              any of the impediments mentioned in Articles 
              37 and 38, may contract marriage. (54a)  Art. 6. No 
              prescribed form or religious rite for the solemnization of the marriage 
              is required. It shall be necessary, however, for the contracting 
              parties to appear personally before the solemnizing officer and 
              declare in the presence of not less than two witnesses of legal 
              age that they take each other as husband and wife. This declaration 
              shall be contained in the marriage certificate which shall be signed 
              by the contracting parties and their witnesses and attested by the 
              solemnizing officer.  In case of a marriage in articulo mortis, when the party at the point of death is unable 
              to sign the marriage certificate, it shall be sufficient for one 
              of the witnesses to the marriage to write the name of said party, 
              which fact shall be attested by the solemnizing officer. (55a)  Art. 7. Marriage 
              may be solemnized by:   
              (1) Any incumbent member of the 
                judiciary within the court's jurisdiction;
 (2) Any priest, rabbi, imam, or minister of any church or religious 
                sect duly authorized by his church or religious sect and registered 
                with the civil registrar general, acting within the limits of 
                the written authority granted by his church or religious sect 
                and provided that at least one of the contracting parties belongs 
                to the solemnizing officer's church or religious sect;
 
 (3) Any ship captain or 
                airplane chief only in the case mentioned in Article 
                31;
 
 (4) Any military commander 
                of a unit to which a chaplain is assigned, in the absence of the 
                latter, during a military operation, likewise only in the cases 
                mentioned in Article 32;
 
 (5) Any consul-general, 
                consul or vice-consul in the case provided in Article 10. (56a)
 Note: The Local 
                Government Code of 1991 restored to the mayors their authority 
                to solemnize marriages.  Art. 8. The 
              marriage shall be solemnized publicly in the chambers of the judge 
              or in open court, in the church, chapel or temple, or in the office 
              the consul-general, consul or vice-consul, as the case may be, and 
              not elsewhere, except in cases of marriages contracted on the point 
              of death or in remote places in accordance with Article 
              29 of this Code, or where both of the parties request the solemnizing 
              officer in writing in which case the marriage may be solemnized 
              at a house or place designated by them in a sworn statement to that 
              effect. (57a)  Art. 9. A 
              marriage license shall be issued by the local civil registrar of 
              the city or municipality where either contracting party habitually 
              resides, except in marriages where no license 
              is required in accordance with Chapter 2 of this Title. (58a) 
               Art. 10. 
              Marriages between Filipino citizens abroad may be solemnized by 
              a consul-general, consul or vice-consul of the Republic of the Philippines. The issuance of the marriage license and the duties 
              of the local civil registrar and of the solemnizing officer with 
              regard to the celebration of marriage shall be performed by said 
              consular official. (75a)  Art. 11. 
              Where a marriage license is required, each of the contracting parties 
              shall file separately a sworn application for such license with 
              the proper local civil registrar which shall specify the following: 
                
              (1) Full name of the contracting 
                party;
 (2) Place of birth;
 
 (3) Age and date of birth;
 
 (4) Civil status;
 
 (5) If previously married, 
                how, when and where the previous marriage was dissolved or annulled;
 
 (6) Present residence and 
                citizenship;
 
 (7) Degree of relationship 
                of the contracting parties;
 
 (8) Full name, residence 
                and citizenship of the father;
 
 (9) Full name, residence 
                and citizenship of the mother; and
 
 (10) Full name, residence 
                and citizenship of the guardian or person having charge, in case 
                the contracting party has neither father nor mother and is under 
                the age of twenty-one years.
 The applicants, their parents or 
              guardians shall not be required to exhibit their residence certificates 
              in any formality in connection with the securing of the marriage 
              license. (59a)  Art. 12. 
              The local civil registrar, upon receiving such application, shall 
              require the presentation of the original birth certificates or, 
              in default thereof, the baptismal certificates of the contracting 
              parties or copies of such documents duly attested by the persons 
              having custody of the originals. These certificates or certified 
              copies of the documents by this Article need not be sworn to and 
              shall be exempt from the documentary stamp tax. The signature and 
              official title of the person issuing the certificate shall be sufficient 
              proof of its authenticity.  If either of the contracting parties 
              is unable to produce his birth or baptismal certificate or a certified 
              copy of either because of the destruction or loss of the original 
              or if it is shown by an affidavit of such party or of any other 
              person that such birth or baptismal certificate has not yet been 
              received though the same has been required of the person having 
              custody thereof at least fifteen days prior to the date of the application, 
              such party may furnish in lieu thereof his current residence certificate 
              or an instrument drawn up and sworn to before the local civil registrar 
              concerned or any public official authorized to administer oaths. 
              Such instrument shall contain the sworn declaration of two witnesses 
              of lawful age, setting forth the full name, residence and citizenship 
              of such contracting party and of his or her parents, if known, and 
              the place and date of birth of such party. The nearest of kin of 
              the contracting parties shall be preferred as witnesses, or, in 
              their default, persons of good reputation in the province or the 
              locality.  The presentation of birth or baptismal 
              certificate shall not be required if the parents of the contracting 
              parties appear personally before the local civil registrar concerned 
              and swear to the correctness of the lawful age of said parties, 
              as stated in the application, or when the local civil registrar 
              shall, by merely looking at the applicants upon their personally 
              appearing before him, be convinced that either or both of them have 
              the required age. (60a)  Art. 13. 
              In case either of the contracting parties has been previously married, 
              the applicant shall be required to furnish, instead of the birth 
              or baptismal certificate required in the last preceding article, 
              the death certificate of the deceased spouse or the judicial decree 
              of the absolute divorce, or the judicial decree of annulment or 
              declaration of nullity of his or her previous marriage.  In case the death certificate cannot 
              be secured, the party shall make an affidavit setting forth this 
              circumstance and his or her actual civil status and the name and 
              date of death of the deceased spouse. (61a)  Art. 14. 
              In case either or both of the contracting parties, not having been 
              emancipated by a previous marriage, are between the ages of eighteen 
              and twenty-one, they shall, in addition to the requirements of the 
              preceding articles, exhibit to the local civil registrar, the consent 
              to their marriage of their father, mother, surviving parent or guardian, 
              or persons having legal charge of them, in the order mentioned. 
              Such consent shall be manifested in writing by the interested party, 
              who personally appears before the proper local civil registrar, 
              or in the form of an affidavit made in the presence of two witnesses 
              and attested before any official authorized by law to administer 
              oaths. The personal manifestation shall be recorded in both applications 
              for marriage license, and the affidavit, if one is executed instead, 
              shall be attached to said applications. (61a)  Art. 15. 
              Any contracting party between the age of twenty-one and twenty-five 
              shall be obliged to ask their parents or guardian for advice upon 
              the intended marriage. If they do not obtain such advice, or if 
              it be unfavorable, the marriage license shall not be issued till 
              after three months following the completion of the publication of 
              the application therefor. A sworn statement 
              by the contracting parties to the effect that such advice has been 
              sought, together with the written advice given, if any, shall be 
              attached to the application for marriage license. Should the parents 
              or guardian refuse to give any advice, this fact shall be stated 
              in the sworn statement. (62a)  Art. 16. 
              In the cases where parental consent or parental advice is needed, 
              the party or parties concerned shall, in addition to the requirements 
              of the preceding articles, attach a certificate issued by a priest, 
              imam or minister authorized to solemnize marriage under Article 
              7 of this Code or a marriage counselor duly accredited by the proper 
              government agency to the effect that the contracting parties have 
              undergone marriage counseling. Failure to attach said certificates 
              of marriage counseling shall suspend the issuance of the marriage 
              license for a period of three months from the completion of the 
              publication of the application. Issuance of the marriage license 
              within the prohibited period shall subject the issuing officer to 
              administrative sanctions but shall not affect the validity of the 
              marriage.  Should only one 
              of the contracting parties need parental consent or parental advice, 
              the other party must 
              be present at the counseling referred to in the preceding paragraph. 
              (n)  Art. 17. 
              The local civil registrar shall prepare a notice which shall contain 
              the full names and residences of the applicants for a marriage license 
              and other data given in the applications. The notice shall be posted 
              for ten consecutive days on a bulletin board outside the office 
              of the local civil registrar located in a conspicuous place within 
              the building and accessible to the general public. This notice shall 
              request all persons having knowledge of any impediment to the marriage 
              to advise the local civil registrar thereof. The marriage license 
              shall be issued after the completion of the period of publication. 
              (63a)  Art. 18. 
              In case of any impediment known to the local civil registrar or 
              brought to his attention, he shall note down the particulars thereof 
              and his findings thereon in the application for marriage license, 
              but shall nonetheless issue said license after the completion of 
              the period of publication, unless ordered otherwise by a competent 
              court at his own instance or that of any interest party. No filing 
              fee shall be charged for the petition nor a corresponding bond required 
              for the issuances of the order. (64a)  Art. 19. 
              The local civil registrar shall require the payment of the fees 
              prescribed by law or regulations before the issuance of the marriage 
              license. No other sum shall be collected in the nature of a fee 
              or tax of any kind for the issuance of said license. It shall, however, 
              be issued free of charge to indigent parties, that is those who 
              have no visible means of income or whose income is insufficient 
              for their subsistence a fact established by their affidavit, or 
              by their oath before the local civil registrar. (65a)  Art. 20. 
              The license shall be valid in any part of the Philippines for a period of one hundred twenty days from the date 
              of issue, and shall be deemed automatically canceled at the expiration 
              of the said period if the contracting parties have not made use 
              of it. The expiry date shall be stamped in bold characters on the 
              face of every license issued. (65a)  Art. 21. 
              When either or both of the contracting parties are citizens of a 
              foreign country, it shall be necessary for them before a marriage 
              license can be obtained, to submit a certificate of legal capacity 
              to contract marriage, issued by their respective diplomatic or consular 
              officials.  Stateless persons or refugees from 
              other countries shall, in lieu of the certificate of legal capacity 
              herein required, submit an affidavit stating the circumstances showing 
              such capacity to contract marriage. (66a)  Art. 22. 
              The marriage certificate, in which the parties shall declare that 
              they take each other as husband and wife, shall also state:   
              (1) The full name, sex and age 
                of each contracting party;
 (2) Their citizenship, religion and habitual residence;
 
 (3) The date and precise time of the celebration of the marriage;
 
 (4) That the proper marriage 
                license has been issued according to law, except in marriage provided 
                for in Chapter 2 of this Title;
 
 (5) That either or both 
                of the contracting parties have secured the parental consent in 
                appropriate cases;
 
 (6) That either or both 
                of the contracting parties have complied with the legal requirement 
                regarding parental advice in appropriate cases; and
 
 (7) That the parties have 
                entered into marriage settlement, if any, attaching a copy thereof. 
                (67a)
 Art. 23. 
              It shall be the duty of the person solemnizing the marriage to furnish 
              either of the contracting parties the original of the marriage certificate 
              referred to in Article 6 and to send the duplicate and triplicate 
              copies of the certificate not later than fifteen days after the 
              marriage, to the local civil registrar of the place where the marriage 
              was solemnized. Proper receipts shall be issued by the local civil 
              registrar to the solemnizing officer transmitting copies of the 
              marriage certificate. The solemnizing officer shall retain in his 
              file the quadruplicate copy of the marriage certificate, the original 
              of the marriage license and, in proper cases, the affidavit of the 
              contracting party regarding the solemnization of the marriage in 
              place other than those mentioned in Article 8. (68a)  Art. 24. 
              It shall be the duty of the local civil registrar to prepare the 
              documents required by this Title, and to administer oaths to all 
              interested parties without any charge in both cases. The documents 
              and affidavits filed in connection with applications for marriage 
              licenses shall be exempt from documentary stamp tax. (n)  Art. 25. 
              The local civil registrar concerned shall enter all applications 
              for marriage licenses filed with him in a registry book strictly 
              in the order in which the same are received. He shall record in 
              said book the names of the applicants, the date on which the marriage 
              license was issued, and such other data as may be necessary. (n) 
               Art. 26. 
              All marriages solemnized outside the Philippines, in accordance with the laws in force in the country 
              where they were solemnized, and valid there as such, shall also 
              be valid in this country, except those prohibited 
              under Articles 35 (1), (4), (5) and (6), 36, 37 and 38. (17a) 
               Where a marriage between a Filipino 
              citizen and a foreigner is validly celebrated and a divorce is thereafter 
              validly obtained abroad by the alien spouse capacitating him or 
              her to remarry, the Filipino spouse shall have capacity to remarry 
              under Philippine law. (As amended by Executive Order 227) 
 Back to top
 Chapter 2. 
              Marriages Exempted from License Requirement Art. 27. 
              In case either or both of the contracting parties are at the point 
              of death, the marriage may be solemnized without necessity of a 
              marriage license and shall remain valid even if the ailing party 
              subsequently survives. (72a)  Art. 28. 
              If the residence of either party is so located that there is no 
              means of transportation to enable such party to appear personally 
              before the local civil registrar, the marriage may be solemnized 
              without necessity of a marriage license. (72a)  Art. 29. 
              In the cases provided for in the two preceding articles, the solemnizing 
              officer shall state in an affidavit executed before the local civil 
              registrar or any other person legally authorized to administer oaths 
              that the marriage was performed in articulo 
              mortis or that the residence of either party, specifying the barrio 
              or barangay, is so located that there is no means of transportation 
              to enable such party to appear personally before the local civil 
              registrar and that the officer took the necessary steps to ascertain 
              the ages and relationship of the contracting parties and the absence 
              of legal impediment to the marriage. (72a)  Art. 30. 
              The original of the affidavit required in the last preceding article, 
              together with the legible copy of the marriage contract, shall be 
              sent by the person solemnizing the marriage to the local civil registrar 
              of the municipality where it was performed within the period of 
              thirty days after the performance of the marriage. (75a)  Art. 31. 
              A marriage in articulo mortis between 
              passengers or crew members may also be solemnized by a ship captain 
              or by an airplane pilot not only while the ship is at sea or the 
              plane is in flight, but also during stopovers at ports of call. 
              (74a)  Art. 32. 
              A military commander of a unit, who is a commissioned officer, shall 
              likewise have authority to solemnize marriages in articulo 
              mortis between persons within the zone of military operation, whether 
              members of the armed forces or civilians. (74a)  Art. 33. 
              Marriages among Muslims or among members of the ethnic cultural 
              communities may be performed validly without the necessity of marriage 
              license, provided they are solemnized in accordance with their customs, 
              rites or practices. (78a)  Art. 34. 
              No license shall be necessary for the marriage of a man and a woman 
              who have lived together as husband and wife for at least five years 
              and without any legal impediment to marry each other. The contracting 
              parties shall state the foregoing facts in an affidavit before any 
              person authorized by law to administer oaths. The solemnizing officer 
              shall also state under oath that he ascertained the qualifications 
              of the contracting parties and found no legal impediment to the 
              marriage. (76a)
 Back to top
 Chapter 3. 
              Void and Voidable Marriages Art. 35. 
              The following marriages shall be void from the beginning:   
              (1) Those contracted by any party 
                below eighteen years of age even with the consent of parents or 
                guardians;
 (2) 
                Those solemnized by any person not legally authorized to perform 
                marriages unless such marriages were contracted with either or 
                both parties believing in good faith that the solemnizing officer 
                had the legal authority to do so;
 
 (3) Those solemnized without 
                license, except those covered the preceding Chapter;
 
 (4) Those bigamous or polygamous 
                marriages not falling under Article 41;
 
 (5) Those contracted through 
                mistake of one contracting party as to the identity of the other; 
                and
 
 (6) Those subsequent marriages 
                that are void under Article 53.
 Art. 36. 
              A marriage contracted by any party who, at the time of the celebration, 
              was psychologically incapacitated to comply with the essential marital 
              obligations of marriage, shall likewise be void even if such incapacity 
              becomes manifest only after its solemnization. (As amended by Executive 
              Order 227)  Art. 37. 
              Marriages between the following are incestuous and void from the 
              beginning, whether the relationship between the parties be 
              legitimate or illegitimate:   
              (1) Between ascendants and descendants 
                of any degree; and
 (2) Between brothers and 
                sisters, whether of the full or half blood. (81a)
 Art. 38. 
              The following marriages shall be void from the beginning for reasons 
              of public policy:   
              (1) Between collateral blood relatives whether legitimate or illegitimate, up to the 
                fourth civil degree;
 (2) Between step-parents 
                and step-children;
 
 (3) Between parents-in-law 
                and children-in-law;
 
 (4) Between the adopting 
                parent and the adopted child;
 
 (5) Between the surviving 
                spouse of the adopting parent and the adopted child;
 
 (6) Between the surviving 
                spouse of the adopted child and the adopter;
 
 (7) Between an adopted 
                child and a legitimate child of the adopter;
 
 (8) Between adopted children 
                of the same adopter; and
 
 (9) Between parties where 
                one, with the intention to marry the other, killed that other 
                person's spouse, or his or her own spouse. (82)
 Art. 39. 
              The action or defense for the declaration of absolute nullity of 
              a marriage shall not prescribe.   
              (As amended by Executive Order 
                227 and Republic Act No. 8533; The phrase "However, in 
                case of marriage celebrated before the effectivity of this Code and falling under Article 36, such 
                action or defense shall prescribe in ten years after this Code 
                shall taken effect" has been deleted by Republic Act 
                No. 8533 [Approved February 23, 1998]).  Art. 40. 
              The absolute nullity of a previous marriage may be invoked for purposes 
              of remarriage on the basis solely of a final judgment declaring 
              such previous marriage void. (n)  Art. 41. 
              A marriage contracted by any person during subsistence of a previous 
              marriage shall be null and void, unless before the celebration of 
              the subsequent marriage, the prior spouse had been absent for four 
              consecutive years and the spouse present has a well-founded belief 
              that the absent spouse was already dead. In case of disappearance 
              where there is danger of death under the circumstances set forth 
              in the provisions of Article 391 of the Civil Code, an absence of 
              only two years shall be sufficient.  For the purpose of contracting 
              the subsequent marriage under the preceding paragraph the spouse 
              present must institute a summary proceeding as provided in this 
              Code for the declaration of presumptive death of the absentee, without 
              prejudice to the effect of reappearance of the absent spouse. (83a) 
               Art. 42. 
              The subsequent marriage referred to in the preceding Article shall 
              be automatically terminated by the recording of the affidavit of 
              reappearance of the absent spouse, unless there is a judgment annulling 
              the previous marriage or declaring it void ab 
              initio.  A sworn statement of the fact and 
              circumstances of reappearance shall be recorded in the civil registry 
              of the residence of the parties to the subsequent marriage at the 
              instance of any interested person, with due notice to the spouses 
              of the subsequent marriage and without prejudice to the fact of 
              reappearance being judicially determined in case such fact is disputed. 
              (n)  Art. 43. 
              The termination of the subsequent marriage referred to in the preceding 
              Article shall produce the following effects:   
              (1) The children of the subsequent 
                marriage conceived prior to its termination shall be considered 
                legitimate;
 (2) The absolute 
                community of property or the conjugal 
                partnership, as the case may be, shall be dissolved and liquidated, 
                but if either spouse contracted said marriage in bad faith, his 
                or her share of the net profits of the community property or conjugal 
                partnership property shall be forfeited in favor of the common 
                children or, if there are none, the children of the guilty spouse 
                by a previous marriage or in default of children, the innocent 
                spouse;
 
 (3) Donations 
                by reason of marriage shall remain valid, except that if the 
                donee contracted the marriage in bad 
                faith, such donations made to said donee are revoked by operation of law;
 
 (4) The innocent spouse may revoke the designation of the other 
                spouse who acted in bad faith as beneficiary in any insurance 
                policy, even if such designation be stipulated as irrevocable; 
                and
 
 (5) The spouse who contracted the subsequent marriage in bad faith 
                shall be disqualified to inherit from the innocent spouse by testate 
                and intestate succession. (n)
 Art. 44. 
              If both spouses of the subsequent marriage acted in bad faith, said 
              marriage shall be void ab initio 
              and all donations by reason of marriage and testamentary dispositions 
              made by one in favor of the other are revoked by operation of law. 
              (n)  Art. 45. 
              A marriage may be annulled for any of the following causes, existing 
              at the time of the marriage:   
              (1) That the party in whose behalf 
                it is sought to have the marriage annulled was eighteen years 
                of age or over but below twenty-one, and the marriage was solemnized 
                without the consent of the parents, guardian or person having 
                substitute parental authority over the party, in that order, unless 
                after attaining the age of twenty-one, such party freely cohabited 
                with the other and both lived together as husband and wife;
 (2) That either party was 
                of unsound mind, unless such party after coming to reason, freely 
                cohabited with the other as husband and wife;
 
 (3) That the consent of 
                either party was obtained by fraud, unless such party afterwards, 
                with full knowledge of the facts constituting the fraud, freely 
                cohabited with the other as husband and wife;
 
 (4) That the consent of either party was obtained by force, intimidation 
                or undue influence, unless the same having disappeared or ceased, 
                such party thereafter freely cohabited with the other as husband 
                and wife;
 
 (5) That either party was physically incapable of consummating 
                the marriage with the other, and such incapacity continues and 
                appears to be incurable; or
 
 (6) That either party was afflicted with a sexually-transmissible 
                disease found to be serious and appears to be incurable. (85a)
 Art. 46. 
              Any of the following circumstances shall constitute fraud referred 
              to in Number 3 of the preceding Article:   
              (1) Non-disclosure of a previous 
                conviction by final judgment of the other party of a crime involving 
                moral turpitude;
 (2) Concealment by the wife of the fact that at the time of the 
                marriage, she was pregnant by a man other than her husband;
 
 (3) Concealment of sexually transmissible disease, regardless 
                of its nature, existing at the time of the marriage; or
 
 (4) Concealment of drug addiction, habitual alcoholism, or homosexuality 
                or lesbianism existing at the time of the marriage.
 No other misrepresentation or deceit 
              as to character, health, rank, fortune or chastity shall constitute 
              such fraud as will give grounds for action for the annulment of 
              marriage. (86a)  Art. 47. 
              The action for annulment of marriage must be filed by the following 
              persons and within the periods indicated herein:   
              (1) For causes mentioned in number 
                1 of Article 45 by the party whose parent or guardian did not 
                give his or her consent, within five years after attaining the 
                age of twenty-one, or by the parent or guardian or person having 
                legal charge of the minor, at any time before such party has reached 
                the age of twenty-one;
 (2) For causes mentioned in number 2 of Article 45, by the same 
                spouse, who had no knowledge of the other's insanity; or by any 
                relative or guardian or person having legal charge of the insane, 
                at any time before the death of either party, or by the insane 
                spouse during a lucid interval or after regaining sanity;
 
 (3) For causes mentioned in number 3 of Article 45, by the injured 
                party, within five years after the discovery of the fraud;
 
 (4) For causes mentioned in number 4 of Article 45, by the injured 
                party, within five years from the time the force, intimidation 
                or undue influence disappeared or ceased;
 
 (5) For causes mentioned in number 5 and 6 of Article 45, by the 
                injured party, within five years after the marriage. (87a)
 Art. 48. 
              In all cases of annulment or declaration of absolute nullity of 
              marriage, the Court shall order the prosecuting attorney or fiscal 
              assigned to it to appear on behalf of the State to take steps to 
              prevent collusion between the parties and to take care that evidence 
              is not fabricated or suppressed.  In the cases referred to in the 
              preceding paragraph, no judgment shall be based upon a stipulation 
              of facts or confession of judgment. (88a)  Art. 49. 
              During the pendency of the action and in the absence of adequate 
              provisions in a written agreement between the spouses, the Court 
              shall provide for the support 
              of the spouses and the custody and support of their common children. 
              The Court shall give paramount consideration to the moral and material 
              welfare of said children and their choice of the parent with whom 
              they wish to remain as provided for in Title 
              IX. It shall also provide for appropriate visitation rights 
              of the other parent. (n)  Art. 50. 
              The effects provided for by paragraphs (2), (3), (4) and (5) of 
              Article 43 and by Article 44 shall also apply in the proper cases 
              to marriages which are declared ab initio 
              or annulled by final judgment under Articles 40 and 45.  The final judgment in such cases 
              shall provide for the liquidation, partition and distribution of 
              the properties of the spouses, the custody and support of the common 
              children, and the delivery of their presumptive legitimes, 
              unless such matters had been adjudicated in previous judicial proceedings. 
               All creditors of the spouses as 
              well as of the absolute community or the conjugal partnership shall 
              be notified of the proceedings for liquidation.  In the partition, the conjugal 
              dwelling and the lot on which it is situated, 
              shall be adjudicated in accordance with the provisions of Articles 
              102 and 129. 
               Art. 51. 
              In said partition, the value of the presumptive legitimes 
              of all common children, computed as of the date of the final judgment 
              of the trial court, shall be delivered in cash, property or sound 
              securities, unless the parties, by mutual agreement judicially approved, 
              had already provided for such matters.  The children or their guardian 
              or the trustee of their property may ask for the enforcement of 
              the judgment.  The delivery of the presumptive 
              legitimes herein prescribed shall in no 
              way prejudice the ultimate successional 
              rights of the children accruing upon the death of either or both 
              of the parents; but the value of the properties already received 
              under the decree of annulment or absolute nullity shall be considered 
              as advances on their legitime. (n)  Art. 52. 
              The judgment of annulment or of absolute nullity of the marriage, 
              the partition and distribution of the properties of the spouses 
              and the delivery of the children's presumptive legitimes 
              shall be recorded in the appropriate civil registry and registries 
              of property; otherwise, the same shall not affect third persons. 
              (n)  Art. 53. 
              Either of the former spouses may marry again after complying with 
              the requirements of the immediately preceding Article; otherwise, 
              the subsequent marriage shall be null and void.  Art. 54. 
              Children conceived or born before the judgment of annulment or absolute 
              nullity of the marriage under Article 36 has become final and executory 
              shall be considered legitimate. Children conceived or born of the 
              subsequent marriage under Article 53 shall likewise be legitimate.
 
 Back to top
 |